이 대통령은 또 "새 정부는 부정과 비리를 없애달라는 역사적 기대를 안고 있다"면서 "도덕적 약점없이 출범한 정권인 만큼 공직자들은 긍지를 갖고 법 집행을 엄정히 해달라"고 지시했다.
Posted by 펄
이 대통령은 아울러 "다음 5년 탄탄대로를 위해 국회를 크게 신장시키는 기회를 만들어 나가야 한다"며 "또 교육, 기업, 정치 등 모든 분야에서 부정과 비리를 없애서 돈이나 많이 버는 나라가 아니라 도덕과 윤리, 법과 질서가 지켜지는 진정한 일류국가를 만들려 한다"고 강조했다.
Posted by 펄
Posted by 펄
정부에서는 또 미네르바가 글을 쓰면서 잘못된 통계를 인용하거나 근거 없이 정책을 비판하는 경우도 부쩍 늘었다고 보고 있다. 또 지난달 26일 '코스피 1차 저점은 820, 2차 저점은 500'이라고 주장하는 등 미확인 루머 진원지라는 비판을 받기도 했다.
Posted by 펄
제 생각은 좀 다릅니다.
강 장관은 본인을 위해서나 이 대통령을 위해서나, 한 건 해서 주가를 올린 지금 물러나는 것이 모양새가 좋다고 봅니다. 위기가 한참 진행중이니 다른 골치아픈 문제가 머지 않아 또 찾아올 것이고, 그때가 되면 지금의 한 건은 도로 묻혀 버릴 테니까요.
그런 정치적 계산을 할 수 있는 머리인지는 또 다른 문제이지만요.
Posted by 펄
Posted by 펄
이코노미스트 최신호에 14페이지짜리 한국 특집이 실렸다. (정확히는 2koreas 특집이니까 남북한 특집 또는 한반도 특집이라고 부르는 게 맞겠지만;;)
http://www.economist.com/printedition/
새로운 내용이 있는 게 아니어서 번역하려는 의욕은 일어나지 않는데...The effect on Mr Lee’s administration was just short of catastrophic. The president’s stellar popularity ratings crashed to earth. He was forced to apologise publicly for failing to take South Koreans’ views into account. His first team of senior advisers in the Blue House was sent packing and his cabinet resigned en masse to allow him to make a fresh start. Calls grew for his own resignation. The beef deal was hastily renegotiated and Mr Lee’s idea for a Grand Canal was dropped.
So has Mr Lee learnt his lesson? On August 15th South Korea celebrated the 60th anniversary of its founding. In the Confucian world 60 is a revered number, signifying a human life coming full circle. Mr Lee used the occasion to relaunch his agenda, albeit with more humility. Ambitious quantities of bills are now being introduced into the National Assembly, in the hope that most of the legislation required for the proposed reforms will be passed by the end of this year. But doubts persist. The government distracted itself with a paranoid campaign to punish the television stations and internet sites that broadcast distortions and plain lies over the beef issue. It should have learnt a lesson about the importance of communication: it should be running a permanent campaign.
The deeper question has to do with the character of the president himself. Those who deal with him every day say he is remarkably resilient, and his belief in his programme is undiminished. But they also point out that he has a habit, carried over from his business days, of getting too involved with the minutiae of his reform plans, keeping staff running around endlessly to produce fresh details for him.
If he is too much of an action man to delegate to technocrats, Mr Lee also dislikes doing many of the things political leaders need to do: schmoozing with local politicians, stroking egos in the National Assembly and keeping up a dialogue with the public. No technocrat can do that for him, and if he does not soon begin to do it himself, his programme will get nowhere.
Posted by 펄
Posted by 펄
Posted by 펄
Posted by 펄
펄의 삶 생각 느낌들을 적는 공간입니다. http://blog.naver.com/pariscom에서 보금자리를 옮겼습니다. 이메일은 pariscom@gmail.com입니다.
- 펄